Backtested Material Engineering Datasheet

Perchloroethylene vs EPDM Compatibility

CAS: 127-18-4 Formula: C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC) Chemical: Perchloroethylene Material: EPDM Grade D

Verified chemical resistance rating (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk), thermal boundary limits (Not recommended at any temperature or concentration), and material specification guide for EPDM exposed to Perchloroethylene in Halogenated Hydrocarbon / Refrigerant service.

Official Resistance Rating Grade D
D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk
EPDM D-Severe Effect
Engineering Verdict — Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk D-Severe Effect

Perchloroethylene vs EPDM: D-Severe Effect

Exposing EPDM to Perchloroethylene (Formula: C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC), CAS: 127-18-4) carries an official rating of D-Severe Effect (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk). Maximum recommended thermal operating limit: Not recommended at any temperature or concentration. Best Grade A alternative materials for continuous or high-temperature service: Viton, PTFE, PVDF.

Verification Audit: Verified against Cole-Parmer, ISM, Graco & CP Lab Safety industrial chemical resistance charts.

Technical Specifications and Operating Parameters

Chemical Medium Perchloroethylene
Chemical Formula C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC)
CAS Registry Number 127-18-4
Chemical Functional Class Halogenated Hydrocarbon / Refrigerant
Wetted Material EPDM
Official Resistance Rating D-Severe Effect (Grade D)
Engineering Service Verdict Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk
Max Temp and Concentration Limit Not recommended at any temperature or concentration
Best Grade A Alternatives Viton, PTFE, PVDF
Backtest and Audit Verification Verified against Cole-Parmer, ISM, Graco & CP Lab Safety industrial chemical resistance charts.

Perchloroethylene Cross-Material Comparison Matrix (9 Materials)

Direct benchmark ratings across all 9 reference industrial materials for Perchloroethylene:

Polypropylene D-Severe Effect
316 Stainless Steel B-Good
Viton (FKM) A-Excellent
PTFE (Teflon) A-Excellent
EPDM D-Severe Effect
PVC Type I B-Good
PVDF (Kynar) A-Excellent
Buna-N (Nitrile) D-Severe Effect
HDPE D-Severe Effect
Material Name Compatibility Rating Service Verdict Temperature Limit Datasheet
Buna-N D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
EPDM D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
HDPE D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
Polypropylene D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
PTFE A-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Ambient to elevated operating temperatures within standard material limits Report
PVC B-Good Acceptable with Operating Controls Ambient service (72°F / 22°C) preferred; monitor wear in continuous service Report
PVDF A-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Ambient to elevated operating temperatures within standard material limits Report
Stainless Steel B-Good Acceptable with Operating Controls Ambient service (72°F / 22°C) preferred; monitor wear in continuous service Report
Viton A-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Ambient to elevated operating temperatures within standard material limits Report

Chemical and Material Interaction Analysis

Engineering Compatibility Verdict

Perchloroethylene vs EPDM: D – Severe Effect (Do Not Use)

Summary Verdict: EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer) is rated D-Severe Effect (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk) when exposed to Perchloroethylene (Formula: C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC), CAS: 127-18-4). PROHIBITED for wetted service. Immediately substitute with an A-rated material shown in the cross-material comparison table below.

Quick Engineering Specifications

Chemical MediaPerchloroethylene
Chemical FormulaC2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC)
CAS Registry Number127-18-4
Chemical ClassificationHalogenated Hydrocarbon / Refrigerant
Wetted MaterialEPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer) (Synthetic Polar-Service Elastomer)
Official Resistance RatingD – Severe Effect (Do Not Use) (Grade D)
Recommended Temperature WindowNot recommended at any temperature or concentration (Material limit: -60°F to 300°F (-51°C to 149°C))
Top Grade-A AlternativesViton, PTFE, PVDF
Data Verification StatusVerified against Cole-Parmer, ISM, Graco & CP Lab Safety industrial chemical resistance charts.

Chemical & Material Interaction Analysis

Perchloroethylene is classified as a halogenated hydrocarbon / refrigerant (high diffusivity and strong non-polar solvent swelling in polyolefins and standard rubbers). Used in vapor degreasing, refrigerant loops, chemical extraction, and polymer manufacturing. When selecting wetted components for EPDM, engineers must account for both concentration-dependent chemical attack and thermal stress:

  • Reaction & Failure Mechanism: Causes rapid, catastrophic material failure—including severe dissolution, stress cracking, extreme volumetric blowout (>25% swell), or rapid pitting corrosion (>50 mpy).
  • Material Profile (EPDM): Outstanding resistance to polar fluids including ketones (acetone, MEK), alcohols, glycols, phosphate ester hydraulic fluids (Skydrol), alkalis, and dilute acids. However, exhibits rapid, catastrophic volumetric swelling and softening when exposed to petroleum oils, gasoline, diesel, kerosene, aliphatic/aromatic hydrocarbons, and chlorinated solvents.
  • Application Scope: Common wetted components include butterfly valve liners, O-rings, sanitary Tri-Clamp gaskets, caustic dosing hoses, and water/wastewater treatment seals.

Cross-Material Compatibility Comparison for Perchloroethylene

To help you select the longest-lasting piping, valve lining, or O-ring seal for Perchloroethylene, the table below compares EPDM against 8 other common industrial engineering materials:

Wetted Material Compatibility Rating Service Recommendation Material Temp Range
Polypropylene (PP Homopolymer & Copolymer)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk32°F to 180°F (0°C to 82°C)
316 / 304 Austenitic Stainless SteelB-GoodAcceptable with Operating Controls-325°F to 800°F (-198°C to 426°C)
Viton® (FKM Fluoroelastomer)A-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-15°F to 400°F (-26°C to 204°C)
PTFE (Teflon® / Polytetrafluoroethylene)A-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-328°F to 500°F (-200°C to 260°C)
EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer) (Current Page)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk-60°F to 300°F (-51°C to 149°C)
PVC Type I (Unplasticized Polyvinyl Chloride / uPVC)B-GoodAcceptable with Operating Controls32°F to 140°F (0°C to 60°C)
PVDF (Kynar® / Polyvinylidene Fluoride)A-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-40°F to 280°F (-40°C to 138°C)
Buna-N (Nitrile / NBR Elastomer)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk-40°F to 250°F (-40°C to 121°C)
HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk-60°F to 140°F (-51°C to 60°C)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is EPDM compatible with Perchloroethylene?

EPDM is rated D-Severe Effect (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk) with Perchloroethylene (Formula: C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC), CAS: 127-18-4). Causes rapid, catastrophic material failure—including severe dissolution, stress cracking, extreme volumetric blowout (>25% swell), or rapid pitting corrosion (>50 mpy). PROHIBITED for wetted service. Immediately substitute with an A-rated material shown in the cross-material comparison table below.

What is the best alternative material for handling Perchloroethylene?

If EPDM does not meet your temperature or pressure requirements for Perchloroethylene, the highest-rated Grade A alternatives are Viton, PTFE, PVDF. Always verify O-ring elastomers and metallic fasteners separately before full-scale deployment.

Technical Engineering FAQs: Perchloroethylene vs EPDM

Click any question below for chemical failure-mode specifics, thermal derating limits, and material selection rules:

Can EPDM be specified for Perchloroethylene process piping, valves, or gaskets?
Do not specify EPDM for wetted service with Perchloroethylene. It carries a Grade D (D-Severe Effect) rating (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk) due to rapid chemical attack, severe swelling, stress cracking, or structural dissolution. Substitute with Grade A materials such as Viton, PTFE, PVDF.
How do all 9 reference materials compare for Perchloroethylene (CAS 127-18-4)?
For Perchloroethylene (C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethylene / PERC), Halogenated Hydrocarbon / Refrigerant), our cross-material compatibility matrix establishes the following ratings across all 9 engineering materials: Polypropylene: D-Severe Effect | 316 Stainless Steel: B-Good | PTFE (Teflon): A-Excellent | PVDF (Kynar): A-Excellent | PVC Type I: B-Good | HDPE: D-Severe Effect | Viton (FKM): A-Excellent | EPDM: D-Severe Effect | Buna-N (Nitrile): D-Severe Effect.