Backtested Material Engineering Datasheet

Nitric Acid (68%) vs Polypropylene Compatibility

CAS: 7697-37-2 Formula: HNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated) Chemical: Nitric Acid (68%) Material: Polypropylene Grade D

Verified chemical resistance rating (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk), thermal boundary limits (Not recommended at any temperature or concentration), and material specification guide for Polypropylene exposed to Nitric Acid (68%) in Strong Oxidizing / Mineral Acid service.

Official Resistance Rating Grade D
D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk
Polypropylene D-Severe Effect
Engineering Verdict — Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk D-Severe Effect

Nitric Acid (68%) vs Polypropylene: D-Severe Effect

Exposing Polypropylene to Nitric Acid (68%) (Formula: HNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated), CAS: 7697-37-2) carries an official rating of D-Severe Effect (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk). Maximum recommended thermal operating limit: Not recommended at any temperature or concentration. Best Grade A alternative materials for continuous or high-temperature service: Stainless Steel, Viton, PTFE, PVDF.

Verification Audit: Verified against Cole-Parmer, ISM, Graco & CP Lab Safety industrial chemical resistance charts.

Technical Specifications and Operating Parameters

Chemical Medium Nitric Acid (68%)
Chemical Formula HNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated)
CAS Registry Number 7697-37-2
Chemical Functional Class Strong Oxidizing / Mineral Acid
Wetted Material Polypropylene
Official Resistance Rating D-Severe Effect (Grade D)
Engineering Service Verdict Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk
Max Temp and Concentration Limit Not recommended at any temperature or concentration
Best Grade A Alternatives Stainless Steel, Viton, PTFE, PVDF
Backtest and Audit Verification Verified against Cole-Parmer, ISM, Graco & CP Lab Safety industrial chemical resistance charts.

Nitric Acid (68%) Cross-Material Comparison Matrix (9 Materials)

Direct benchmark ratings across all 9 reference industrial materials for Nitric Acid (68%):

Polypropylene D-Severe Effect
316 Stainless Steel A1-Excellent
Viton (FKM) A1-Excellent
PTFE (Teflon) A-Excellent
EPDM D-Severe Effect
PVC Type I C1-Fair
PVDF (Kynar) A1-Excellent
Buna-N (Nitrile) D-Severe Effect
HDPE D-Severe Effect
Material Name Compatibility Rating Service Verdict Temperature Limit Datasheet
Buna-N D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
EPDM D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
HDPE D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
Polypropylene D-Severe Effect Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk Not recommended at any temperature or concentration Report
PTFE A-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Ambient to elevated operating temperatures within standard material limits Report
PVC C1-Fair Caution: Short-Term or Emergency Use Only Short-term exposure only; avoid continuous pressurized service Report
PVDF A1-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Up to 120°F (49°C) verified; up to material thermal limit in non-pressurized service Report
Stainless Steel A1-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Up to 120°F (49°C) verified; up to material thermal limit in non-pressurized service Report
Viton A1-Excellent Safe for Continuous Industrial Service Up to 120°F (49°C) verified; up to material thermal limit in non-pressurized service Report

Chemical and Material Interaction Analysis

Engineering Compatibility Verdict

Nitric Acid (68%) vs Polypropylene: D – Severe Effect (Do Not Use)

Summary Verdict: Polypropylene (PP Homopolymer & Copolymer) is rated D-Severe Effect (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk) when exposed to Nitric Acid (68%) (Formula: HNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated), CAS: 7697-37-2). PROHIBITED for wetted service. Immediately substitute with an A-rated material shown in the cross-material comparison table below.

Quick Engineering Specifications

Chemical MediaNitric Acid (68%)
Chemical FormulaHNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated)
CAS Registry Number7697-37-2
Chemical ClassificationStrong Oxidizing / Mineral Acid
Wetted MaterialPolypropylene (PP Homopolymer & Copolymer) (Semi-Crystalline Polyolefin Thermoplastic)
Official Resistance RatingD – Severe Effect (Do Not Use) (Grade D)
Recommended Temperature WindowNot recommended at any temperature or concentration (Material limit: 32°F to 180°F (0°C to 82°C))
Top Grade-A AlternativesStainless Steel, Viton, PTFE, PVDF
Data Verification StatusVerified against Cole-Parmer, ISM, Graco & CP Lab Safety industrial chemical resistance charts.

Chemical & Material Interaction Analysis

Nitric Acid (68%) is classified as a strong oxidizing / mineral acid (corrosive proton attack combined with strong oxidative potential). Used in chemical synthesis, metal pickling, pH neutralization, and industrial etching. When selecting wetted components for Polypropylene, engineers must account for both concentration-dependent chemical attack and thermal stress:

  • Reaction & Failure Mechanism: Causes rapid, catastrophic material failure—including severe dissolution, stress cracking, extreme volumetric blowout (>25% swell), or rapid pitting corrosion (>50 mpy).
  • Material Profile (Polypropylene): Broad resistance to aqueous acids, caustics, plating baths, and inorganic salt solutions without stress-corrosion cracking. However, susceptible to oxidative chain scission in strong oxidizing acids (fuming nitric/oleum) and rapid swelling/softening in chlorinated or aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • Application Scope: Common wetted components include bulk chemical storage tanks, AODD pump manifolds, Schedule 80 piping, filter housings, and laboratory labware.

Cross-Material Compatibility Comparison for Nitric Acid (68%)

To help you select the longest-lasting piping, valve lining, or O-ring seal for Nitric Acid (68%), the table below compares Polypropylene against 8 other common industrial engineering materials:

Wetted Material Compatibility Rating Service Recommendation Material Temp Range
Polypropylene (PP Homopolymer & Copolymer) (Current Page)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk32°F to 180°F (0°C to 82°C)
316 / 304 Austenitic Stainless SteelA1-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-325°F to 800°F (-198°C to 426°C)
Viton® (FKM Fluoroelastomer)A1-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-15°F to 400°F (-26°C to 204°C)
PTFE (Teflon® / Polytetrafluoroethylene)A-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-328°F to 500°F (-200°C to 260°C)
EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk-60°F to 300°F (-51°C to 149°C)
PVC Type I (Unplasticized Polyvinyl Chloride / uPVC)C1-FairCaution: Short-Term or Emergency Use Only32°F to 140°F (0°C to 60°C)
PVDF (Kynar® / Polyvinylidene Fluoride)A1-ExcellentSafe for Continuous Industrial Service-40°F to 280°F (-40°C to 138°C)
Buna-N (Nitrile / NBR Elastomer)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk-40°F to 250°F (-40°C to 121°C)
HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene)D-Severe EffectIncompatible — Immediate Failure Risk-60°F to 140°F (-51°C to 60°C)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is Polypropylene compatible with Nitric Acid (68%)?

Polypropylene is rated D-Severe Effect (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk) with Nitric Acid (68%) (Formula: HNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated), CAS: 7697-37-2). Causes rapid, catastrophic material failure—including severe dissolution, stress cracking, extreme volumetric blowout (>25% swell), or rapid pitting corrosion (>50 mpy). PROHIBITED for wetted service. Immediately substitute with an A-rated material shown in the cross-material comparison table below.

What is the best alternative material for handling Nitric Acid (68%)?

If Polypropylene does not meet your temperature or pressure requirements for Nitric Acid (68%), the highest-rated Grade A alternatives are Stainless Steel, Viton, PTFE, PVDF. Always verify O-ring elastomers and metallic fasteners separately before full-scale deployment.

Technical Engineering FAQs: Nitric Acid (68%) vs Polypropylene

Click any question below for chemical failure-mode specifics, thermal derating limits, and material selection rules:

Can Polypropylene be specified for Nitric Acid (68%) process piping, valves, or gaskets?
Do not specify Polypropylene for wetted service with Nitric Acid (68%). It carries a Grade D (D-Severe Effect) rating (Incompatible — Immediate Failure Risk) due to rapid chemical attack, severe swelling, stress cracking, or structural dissolution. Substitute with Grade A materials such as Stainless Steel, Viton, PTFE, PVDF.
How do all 9 reference materials compare for Nitric Acid (68%) (CAS 7697-37-2)?
For Nitric Acid (68%) (HNO3 (68% Azeotropic Concentrated), Strong Oxidizing / Mineral Acid), our cross-material compatibility matrix establishes the following ratings across all 9 engineering materials: Polypropylene: D-Severe Effect | 316 Stainless Steel: A1-Excellent | PTFE (Teflon): A-Excellent | PVDF (Kynar): A1-Excellent | PVC Type I: C1-Fair | HDPE: D-Severe Effect | Viton (FKM): A1-Excellent | EPDM: D-Severe Effect | Buna-N (Nitrile): D-Severe Effect.